Thoughts for meditation and discussion. It seams many people do not think things through or look at issues from both sides. Most of these post contain only questions to help people think. I have tried to keep my opinions out of the discussion. If your opinion differs from mine that is OK. But think about it.
Mathjax
jsxgraph
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Sunday, June 9, 2013
More Factorial Fun, Python and Lisp
More Factorial Fun, Python and Lisp
This continues the factorial study started in the prior post. The factorial increases rapidly and can be programmed as a simple loop. The factorial, indicated with an exclamation point after a positive integer number is the product of all integers from 1 up to and including the integer.
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Factorial Programs (Fortran and C Family)
Factorial Fun
There are many computer programming languages and many more being developed all the time. Usually the first program when learning a new language is "Hello World!", which outputs the text "Hello World!" to the screen.For engineers, scientist and mathematicians the next program should be the factorial. The factorial is symbolized with an exclamation point, !, after a positive integer. It occurs often in probability and series. The factorial is the product of all integers from one up to and including the number.
- 1! = 1
- 2! = 1*2 = 2
- 3! = 1*2*3 = 6
- 4! = 1*2*3*4 = 24
- 5! = 1*2*3*4*5 = 120
The following example programs in various computer languages take a number from the user, without checking if it is valid, to keep the code simple, and returns its factorial. Each example includes an introduction and detailed description.
Monday, April 15, 2013
PDE1D - A code for comptational methods for 1 dimensional PDEs
I have been working on a program for teaching and research on One Dimensional Partial Differential Equation Numerical Solution Methods. I hope to add many more methods and PDE equations. The current Wave and Burger's Equation solvers with symmetric boundary conditions can be fun to play with various parameters. The figure below shows solutions using three different solvers at a CFL of 0.9. CFL is a time step constraint where at a CFL of 1 the wave would travel one point each step. The methods shown are 1st order upwind Euler explicit which is dissipative so the amplitude decreases. The FEM, Finite Element Method, uses the very stable trapezoidal time integration with linear elements. This FEM method has no dissipation but some phase error resulting in a shift in the peak values. Finally the RK4 - Fourth order Runge Kutta method using FEM linear elements is the most accurate but requires more computation and is stable only to CFL = 1.
PDE1D screen shot.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)