Some politicians are suggesting alternatives to police for law enforcement and protection.
What are these alternatives?
- Let communities form their own vigilante groups.
- Would this totally remove the over site of hearings about brutality or fairness?
- Commercial protection companies.
- Would this lead to an opening for protection rackets?
- Have psychologists talk criminals into turning themselves in.
- How many criminals would listen to a psychologist?
- How many murders, drug dealers, stalkers, etc. would turn themselves in for prosecution?
- How many murders would just shoot the psychologist?
- Let drug lords, bookies and pimps enforce the law.
- Would these people jump at the opportunity to enforce the law?
- Let gangs maintain the peace.
- How many people would be killed for not following the gangs orders?
- Who would gather and document evidence for prosecution of criminals?
- Would there be a need for a trial at all?
- How would appropriate punishment and reform be determined?
- Is the best deterrent to crime the assurance of being caught?
- Does police dominance of criminals help assure they will be peacefully brought to trial for their actions?
- Would more police help catch more criminals?